The Viewpoint: Can we really resurrect extinct animals, or are we just creating hi-tech lookalikes?

The Viewpoint: Can we really resurrect extinct animals, or are we just creating hi-tech lookalikes?

The ambitious effort to resurrect extinct species, such as the woolly mammoth, raises a key question: Are we truly reversing extinction, or just creating high-tech lookalikes?
De-extinction: Resurrection or Reimagination?

Can we really resurrect extinct animals, or are we just creating hi-tech lookalikes?

The Promise of De-Extinction

The idea of resurrecting extinct species like the woolly mammoth and dire wolf has captured the public imagination. Biotech company Colossal Biosciences is leading the charge, using genetic engineering to bring back traits of long-lost animals. This has fueled a sense that de-extinction is imminent, but it also raises a crucial question.

If we build a new creature from fragments of an extinct genome, is it true resurrection, or are we just creating a lookalike?

The Science of the Comeback

De-extinction uses several techniques, including selective breeding, cloning, and genome editing. Because ancient DNA is often incomplete, most projects don’t create an exact genetic copy. Instead, scientists use the powerful editing tool CRISPR to insert key genes from an extinct species into the genome of a close living relative. The result is not a perfect replica, but a “proxy”—a modern hybrid engineered to resemble its ancestor.

Artist's rendering of woolly mammoths in a snowy landscape.
Projects like the woolly mammoth revival aim to create a ‘proxy’ animal that can fulfill an extinct species’ ecological role.

A Mammoth Undertaking

To create a woolly mammoth, scientists aren’t starting from scratch. They are editing the DNA of an Asian elephant, its closest living relative. However, the two species differ by an estimated 1.5 million genetic variants. Since editing all of them is impossible, scientists target a few dozen genes linked to key traits like cold resistance and hair growth. The resulting animal will be more of a cold-adapted elephant than a true mammoth.

Humans and chimpanzees are 98.8% genetically similar, yet the physical and behavioural differences are huge. This shows how small genetic gaps can lead to major differences.

From Resurrection to Conservation

A more grounded use of this technology is in conservation. The effort to save the functionally extinct northern white rhino, for example, uses preserved genetic material from the last individuals to create viable embryos with a surrogate mother. This is less about reversing extinction and more about preventing it. The tools of de-extinction may ultimately be most valuable for helping endangered species by boosting genetic diversity or resilience to disease.

A northern white rhinoceros in a grassy field.
The same gene-editing technology could help save critically endangered species like the northern white rhino.
What we’re witnessing isn’t resurrection. It’s reimagination.

Related Posts