{"id":5170,"date":"2022-12-02T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/?p=5170"},"modified":"2022-11-18T06:12:16","modified_gmt":"2022-11-18T06:12:16","slug":"astronomers-have-detected-another-planet-killer-asteroid-could-we-miss-one-coming-our-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/astronomers-have-detected-another-planet-killer-asteroid-could-we-miss-one-coming-our-way\/","title":{"rendered":"Astronomers have detected another \u2018planet killer\u2019 asteroid. Could we miss one coming our way?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n \n
\n Artist\u2019s impression of the asteroid discovered toward the Sun.\n DOE\/FNAL\/DECam\/CTIO\/NOIRLab\/NSF\/AURA\/J. da Silva\/Spaceengine<\/a><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\nSteven Tingay<\/a>, Curtin University<\/a><\/em><\/span>\n\n

If you surfed the web this morning, you may have seen news of the latest existential threat to humanity: a \u201cplanet killer\u201d asteroid named 2022 AP7.<\/p>\n\n

Luckily for us 2022 AP7 \u201chas no chance to hit the Earth currently\u201d, according<\/a> to Scott Sheppard at the Carnegie Institution for Science. He and his international team of colleagues observed 2022 AP7<\/a> in a trio of \u201crather large\u201d asteroids obscured by the Sun\u2019s glare (the other two don\u2019t pose a risk).<\/p>\n\n

2022 AP7 orbits the Sun every five years, and currently crosses Earth\u2019s orbit when Earth is on the other side of the Sun to it. Eventually its movement will sync with Earth\u2019s and it will cross much closer by, but this will be centuries into the future.<\/p>\n\n

We simply don\u2019t know enough about 2022 AP7 to precisely predict the danger it may pose centuries from now. At the same time, we suspect there could be other \u201cplanet killers\u201d out there yet to be discovered. But how many? And what\u2019s being done to find them?<\/p>\n\n

What makes a planet killer?<\/h2>\n\n

Asteroid 2022 AP7 is the largest potentially hazardous asteroid (PHA) found in eight years, with a diameter between 1.1km and 2.3km. For context, an asteroid with a diameter more than 1km is enough to trigger a mass extinction event<\/a> on Earth. <\/p>\n\n

As well as having a diameter greater than 1km, an asteroid also needs to have an orbit that crosses Earth\u2019s to be considered potentially dangerous. In the case of 2022 AP7, any threat is centuries down the track. The important point is it has been detected and can now be tracked. This is the best possible outcome.<\/p>\n\n

It is estimated we\u2019ve already discovered<\/a> about 95% of potentially hazardous asteroids, and that there are fewer than 1,000 of these. The work of Sheppard and colleagues highlights that hunting down the remaining 5% \u2013 some 50 asteroids \u2013 will be a massive effort.<\/p>\n\n

\n \"\"\n
\n Statistically, there\u2019s less of a chance of a larger asteroid colliding with Earth compared to a smaller one.<\/span>\n NASA<\/span><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n

What constitutes a near miss?<\/h2>\n\n

NASA closely tracks<\/a> all known objects in the Solar System. But every now and again an object will catch us off guard.<\/p>\n\n

In 2021, we had a close call with an asteroid called 2021 UA1<\/a>. It came only a few thousand kilometres from Earth, over the Antarctic. In cosmic terms, this is uncomfortably close. However, 2021 UA1 was only two metres across, and therefore posed no substantial risk. <\/p>\n\n

There are likely hundreds of millions of objects of this size in our Solar System, and it\u2019s not uncommon for them to impact Earth. In these cases, most of the object burns up in the atmosphere and creates a spectacular light show, with little risk to life.<\/p>\n\n

In 2019 another asteroid<\/a> with a 100m diameter passed Earth some 70,000km away. It was publicly announced mere hours before it flew past. While it wasn\u2019t as close, it was of a much more concerning size.<\/p>\n\n

These near misses reiterate how important it is for us to speed up the search for near-Earth objects.<\/p>\n\n

Blind spots<\/h2>\n\n

The reason we haven\u2019t already found every object that could one day pass nearby Earth is largely because of observational blind spots, and the fact we can\u2019t observe all parts of the sky all the time.<\/p>\n\n

To find 2022 AP7, Sheppard and colleagues used a telescope at twilight soon after the Sun had set. They had to do this because they were looking for asteroids in the vicinity of Venus and Earth. Venus is currently on the other side of the Sun<\/a> to Earth.<\/p>\n\n

Making observations close to the Sun is difficult. The Sun\u2019s glare overwhelms the weak light reflected off small asteroids \u2013 presenting a blind spot. But just before and after sunset, there\u2019s a small window in which the Sun\u2019s glare no longer blocks the view. <\/p>\n\n

Right now there are only about 25 asteroids known to have well-determined orbits that lie entirely within Earth\u2019s orbit. More are likely to be discovered, and these may contribute significantly to the missing 5% of potentially hazardous asteroids.<\/p>\n\n

The Near-Earth Object Surveyor<\/h2>\n\n

A recent NASA mission spectacularly demonstrated that humans can purposefully change the trajectory of an asteroid. NASA\u2019s DART (Double Asteroid Redirection Test<\/a>) mission collided a vending-machine-sized spacecraft into a 160m diameter minor-planet moon called Dimorphos.<\/p>\n\n

\n \"\"\n
\n The DART spacecraft successfully collided with Dimorphos, which itself was orbiting a larger asteroid named Didymos.<\/span>\n NASA\/Johns Hopkins APL\/Steve Gribben<\/span><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n

The collision altered Dimorphos\u2019s 12-hour orbital period by more than 30 minutes, and was declared a resounding success. So it\u2019s plausible for humans to redirect a hazardous asteroid if we find one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That said, we\u2019d have to find it well in advance. Potentially hazardous asteroids are much larger than Dimorphos, so a bigger collision would be required with plenty of lead time. <\/p>\n\n

To do this, NASA has plans to survey for potentially hazardous objects using a telescope in space. Its Near-Earth Object (NEO) Surveyor<\/a>, scheduled to launch in 2026, will be able to survey the Solar System very efficiently \u2013 including within blind spots caused by the Sun. <\/p>\n\n

That\u2019s because the glare we see while observing from Earth is caused by Earth\u2019s atmosphere. But in space there\u2019s no atmosphere to look through. <\/p>\n\n

\n \"\"\n
\n The NEO Surveyor spacecraft won\u2019t have the issue of observational blind spots when hunting for asteroids.<\/span>\n NASA\/JPL\/University of Arizona<\/span><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n

It\u2019s very likely the Near-Earth Object Surveyor will reveal new objects, and help us characterise a large number of objects to greatly improve our understanding of threats.<\/p>\n\n

The key is to find as many objects as possible, categorise them, track the risks, and plan a redirection mission as much in advance as possible. The fact that all of these elements of planetary defence are now a reality is an amazing feat of science and engineering. It is the first time in human history we have these capabilities.\"The<\/p>\n\n

Steven Tingay<\/a>, John Curtin Distinguished Professor (Radio Astronomy), Curtin University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n\n

This article is republished from The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Artist\u2019s impression of the asteroid discovered toward the Sun. DOE\/FNAL\/DECam\/CTIO\/NOIRLab\/NSF\/AURA\/J. da Silva\/Spaceengine Steven Tingay, Curtin University If you…\n","protected":false},"author":285,"featured_media":5142,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[211,298,474],"class_list":{"0":"post-5170","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-asteroid","9":"tag-mass-extinction","10":"tag-the-conversation","11":"cs-entry","12":"cs-video-wrap"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/285"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5170"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5171,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5170\/revisions\/5171"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}