{"id":4784,"date":"2022-09-21T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-09-21T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/?p=4784"},"modified":"2022-09-08T05:35:47","modified_gmt":"2022-09-08T05:35:47","slug":"why-do-we-always-need-to-wait-for-launch-windows-to-get-a-rocket-to-space","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/why-do-we-always-need-to-wait-for-launch-windows-to-get-a-rocket-to-space\/","title":{"rendered":"Why do we always need to wait for \u2018launch windows\u2019 to get a rocket to space?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n \n
\n \n NASA<\/a><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\nGail Iles<\/a>, RMIT University<\/a><\/em><\/span>\n\n

Earlier this week, the Artemis I Moon mission was scrubbed again; now we have to wait for a new launch window<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n

Just 40 minutes before the Space Launch System rocket was set to take off from Kennedy Space Centre in Florida on September 3, a leaking fuel line caused engineers to scrub the launch.<\/p>\n\n

So what is a launch window, and why can\u2019t a rocket go up at any time? And what does it mean to \u201cscrub\u201d it?<\/p>\n\n

Waiting for the right alignment<\/h2>\n\n

A launch window is like waiting for the stars to align. The rocket will be \u201cthrown\u201d off the surface of Earth. This toss must be timed perfectly so the craft\u2019s resulting path through space sends it \u2013 and everything it\u2019s carrying \u2013 towards the intended location at the right time.<\/p>\n\n

For Artemis I \u2013 a mission to send the Orion capsule into orbit around the Moon \u2013 the \u201cright time\u201d means waiting for the Moon to be as close to Earth as possible (known as \u201cperigee\u201d) during its 28-day cycle<\/a>. Hence why we\u2019ll now be waiting roughly four weeks for the next moonshot.<\/p>\n\n

\n \"A\n
\n Animation of Artemis I around Earth, the frame rotating with the Moon.<\/span>\n Phoenix7777\/Wikimedia Commons<\/a>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n

With much of the flight path relying on gravity assists (a \u201cswing-by\u201d that uses the momentum of a large body to increase or decrease the speed of a passing craft) from both Earth and the Moon, and because we want the Orion capsule to come back safely, the timing is crucial.<\/p>\n\n

Orion must slingshot past the Moon, not crash into it, so the positions of the rocket launcher, Earth, Moon and lunar capsule must all be known precisely at all times.<\/p>\n\n

It was a similar story with the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope. In this case, mission controllers were making sure it didn\u2019t hit the Moon on its way to Lagrange Point 2<\/a> \u2013 a gravitationally balanced spot between Earth and the Sun. The launch of the telescope was scrubbed a couple of times to avoid bad weather; it eventually launched from French Guiana on an Ariane 5 rocket on Christmas Day 2021.<\/p>\n\n

\n \"A<\/a>\n
\n Artemis I flight trajectory of the Space Launch System rocket and Orion crew capsule.<\/span>\n NASA<\/span><\/span>\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Weird\u2019 mission lingo<\/h2>\n\n

So why is it called \u201cscrubbing\u201d the launch and not cancelling it? Turns out there\u2019s some fairly specific lingo for space missions.<\/p>\n\n

There are actually five different words used for abandoned space missions. \u201cScrubbed\u201d, \u201ccancelled\u201d, \u201cscrapped\u201d, \u201cretired\u201d and \u201cterminated\u201d all sound alike, but to mission planners they mean different things.<\/p>\n\n

A mission that is \u201ccancelled\u201d will not be launched. For example, the International X-ray Laboratory<\/a> was planned to be launched in 2021 as a joint effort by NASA, the European Space Agency (ESA), and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), but due to budget cuts it was cancelled. Planning had gone into it, research had been done, but nothing was built. This is a mission cancellation, which usually happens in the developmental stages.<\/p>\n\n

If the mission is part of a program that is axed, this is \u201ctermination\u201d. So if Russia leaves the International Space Station program, its participation will be terminated, even though the ISS mission continues. This is the same as when NASA terminated participation in the ESA ExoMars<\/a> mission.<\/p>\n\n

On the other hand, the last Saturn V rockets were \u201cscrapped\u201d when the last three Apollo missions were \u201ccancelled\u201d. Two Saturn V rockets are on display<\/a> at Johnson and Kennedy Space Centers, made up of \u201cscraps\u201d from several older rockets and missions. <\/p>\n\n

Finally, we\u2019re used to seeing astronauts retire, but the same happens to space missions too. The Mercury, Gemini, Apollo and STS (space shuttle) programs have all been \u201cretired\u201d. This means no further missions of that type will occur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrubbed<\/h2>\n\n

So, why was the Artemis I launch scrubbed? The expression \u201cscrubbed\u201d is a leftover from the days when mission details were handwritten on a chalk board. If bad weather or equipment failure happened, the mission start time information was wiped off the chalkboard with a damp cloth \u2013 scrubbed.<\/p>\n\n

It\u2019s still assumed the mission will happen, but it will be rescheduled for a different time. <\/p>\n\n

This is good news for all those eagerly waiting to see Moon missions happen again for the first time in 50 years. The Artemis I launch has merely been postponed to the next available launch window.\"The<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gail Iles<\/a>, Senior Lecturer in Physics, RMIT University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n\n

This article is republished from The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"NASA Gail Iles, RMIT University Earlier this week, the Artemis I Moon mission was scrubbed again; now we…\n","protected":false},"author":205,"featured_media":4785,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,14],"tags":[529,44,438,474],"class_list":{"0":"post-4784","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-math-and-the-sciences","8":"category-space","9":"tag-aerospace","10":"tag-nasa","11":"tag-rocket","12":"tag-the-conversation","13":"cs-entry","14":"cs-video-wrap"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/205"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4784"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4786,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784\/revisions\/4786"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/modernsciences.org\/staging\/4414\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}